Share article
The Bitter Truth: Ghana’s Cocoa Farmers in Crisis
Ghana’s cocoa industry rests on an ugly contradiction. One of the world’s richest agricultural supply chains depends on growers who bear the heaviest risks yet receive little of the reward. As chocolate prices are projected to rise by over 14% this year, in a market forecast to be worth US$146 billion by 2035, and with cocoa prices doubling in 2024 and continuing to climb, the plight of the farmer remains dire. Up to 90% of Ghanaian cocoa farmers, who produce some of the highest quality beans globally, do not earn a living income, with many of the country’s 800,000 or so growers struggling to survive on just $2 a day.
This systemic failure is often attributed to multinational chocolate companies, and for good reason. The global confectionery business is adept at preserving margins, while those at the foundational step of the supply chain are trapped in poverty. However, in Ghana, the inequity is not solely imported; it is deeply embedded within the country’s cocoa marketing system itself.
The Ghanaian Cocoa Marketing System: A Historical Burden
Cocoa farming is both physically and economically demanding. Trees require years to mature, and the crop demands constant upkeep. Many farmers face significant challenges from climate stress, pests, and disease long before they see a return on their labor. The producer confronts multiple risks—biological, environmental, and market-related—yet, on pricing, the farmer has virtually no say.
Under Ghana’s current system, farmers are legally obligated to sell their produce exclusively through the Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOBOD) or its licensed buyers. Prices are set below market rates by bureaucrats in Accra, rather than being determined by competitive market forces. This arrangement dates back to World War II, when the British colonial government assumed control of cocoa marketing from private firms, selling cocoa directly to the British Food Ministry. In 1947, the colonial government established the Cocoa Marketing Board (the predecessor to COCOBOD), granting it control over both internal and external marketing, and later adding extension services.
This centralized system has long been defended by successive governments as a means to stabilize farmers’ incomes, maintain quality standards, and maximize exports. Essentially, it serves as a mechanism for the state to wield power over a sector whose fundamental value is created elsewhere: on small farms, by poorly compensated growers.
The Inequity of Current Pricing and Market Instability
Over the past 15 years, Ghanaian cocoa farmers have received, on average, just 61% of the world price, according to ICCO data. A recent flashpoint occurred in February when the Ghana government drastically cut the farm-gate cocoa price for the remainder of the 2025/26 season from GH¢58,000 (US$5,246) a tonne to GH¢41,392 a tonne—a cut of nearly 29%. Officials argued that the previous price had rendered Ghanaian cocoa uncompetitive and deterred buyers. However, this episode starkly exposed the underlying imbalance: when markets wobble, farmers are expected to absorb the shock, yet when markets strengthen, they capture only a fraction of the upside.
This approach is unsustainable for a sector upon which so many livelihoods depend. While a marketing board can play a crucial role in quality control, extension services, financing, and sector strategy, it should not act as a choke point through which every single bean must pass. Ghana’s growers should not be treated as captive suppliers to a state-backed buyer with the unilateral power to dictate terms.
A Path to Fairer Practices and Value Addition
The status quo is not the only viable model. Ensuring quality standards does not necessitate a monopsony—the current market structure characterized by a single buyer and numerous sellers (primarily farmers). Instead, standards can be effectively enforced through mechanisms such as licensing, grading, traceability, and export certification. Price volatility, similarly, does not demand the suppression of competition; it can be managed through direct support for farmers, perhaps via cooperatives, during difficult years. Furthermore, smuggling, a persistent issue, can be better addressed by narrowing the gap between official and market prices rather than by attempting to enforce an inherently inequitable system.
Ghana does not need to shortchange smallholder farmers through implicit taxation in its pursuit of revenue. Far greater and more durable economic gains lie in expanding what “cocoa” represents. Beyond the export of raw beans lies an entire ecosystem of high-value products that can be developed and scaled with the right policy support. For instance:
- Cacao Pod Husks: Typically discarded, these can be transformed into animal feed, biochar, compost, or biomass energy. In rural areas facing persistent energy gaps, husk-based power generation offers a practical, decentralized solution while simultaneously converting agricultural waste into a new revenue stream.
- Cacao Pulp: Long enjoyed locally as a sweet, nutritious drink, the pulp can be industrialized into juices, concentrates, and food ingredients for both domestic consumption and export markets.
- Bean Shells: Even the thin shells surrounding the beans present untapped opportunities. They can be milled into nutrient-rich cocoa flour, applied as mulch, or converted into organic fertilizers that improve soil health and reduce input costs for farmers.
With targeted investment in processing infrastructure, research, and robust private sector partnerships, Ghana can build a diversified cocoa economy that generates sustainable jobs, expands export revenues, and significantly raises farmer incomes. This forward-looking approach offers a more sustainable path to revenue growth than policies that compel smallholders to sell raw beans at below-market prices fixed by COCOBOD.
The Urgency of Reform and Resistance to Change
The case for reform is compelling because the current model is demonstrably failing, even on its own terms. The centralized system consistently fails to guarantee prompt payment, does not reliably secure better returns for producers, and still leaves the majority of farmers below a living income. A structure built in the name of stability is, in practice, failing the very people it was intended to protect.
Undeniably, there is a political economy behind the resistance to change. Cocoa is a strategic export, vital for foreign exchange and the state’s ability to influence a leading commodity sector. This necessitates an honest and robust public debate. Ghana cannot genuinely champion the welfare of cocoa farmers while simultaneously preserving a system that fundamentally limits their bargaining power and socializes their losses.
The broader chocolate industry also bears significant responsibilities. International companies that loudly champion sustainability should actively support reforms that introduce transparency and grant farmers a greater share of value, rather than merely funding marginal programs. A supply chain in which growers are perpetually kept poor is, by definition, always unsustainable.
Ghana does not need to abandon regulation. Instead, it must abandon the comforting fiction that state control, as currently enforced, is genuinely protecting farmers. The better path lies in establishing a system where COCOBOD effectively regulates, certifies, and supports the industry, but no longer dominates the market to the detriment of its farmers. Until such reforms are enacted, one of our country’s proudest exports will continue to depend on a crass injustice: those who undertake the hardest work are paid the least for it.
